You make the assumption that the felony/ies were valid and not a matter of "law-fare". And, that there was fairness in the application of the law (e.g. - see Hillary's confirmed offenses; uncharged. Biden's confirmed offenses; uncharged). So, yes...I hired the "felon" over abject incompetence.
Perhaps I'd have made another choice were there an viable "other" choice. But, I went with a "proven performer"...and, I believe in second-chance employment.
Comparing the "hiring" of president, to that of a teacher (with direct access to children) is ludicrous.
And, it appears, the president's children have turned out just fine, thank you.
Hey Robert, thanks for bringing a different perspective to the issue. It's given me some things to think about this morning. It's always good to have others push on the thoughts and opinions you put forward and I'm grateful you took the time to push on mine.
You make the assumption that the felony/ies were valid and not a matter of "law-fare". And, that there was fairness in the application of the law (e.g. - see Hillary's confirmed offenses; uncharged. Biden's confirmed offenses; uncharged). So, yes...I hired the "felon" over abject incompetence.
Perhaps I'd have made another choice were there an viable "other" choice. But, I went with a "proven performer"...and, I believe in second-chance employment.
Comparing the "hiring" of president, to that of a teacher (with direct access to children) is ludicrous.
And, it appears, the president's children have turned out just fine, thank you.
Keep asking better questions...
Hey Robert, thanks for bringing a different perspective to the issue. It's given me some things to think about this morning. It's always good to have others push on the thoughts and opinions you put forward and I'm grateful you took the time to push on mine.